When I uncovered the story surrounding Theodor Pfizer and the scholarship foundation, I felt compelled to warn the world about Europe, and especially about Germany. First and foremost, I warned intelligence agencies like the Mossad, which seems to have completely missed the whole thing, as this foundation also operates in Israel and, at the same time, maintained excellent ties to the PLO via the RAF. It is therefore an institution that serves both sides, and with this past in mind. The work of judges promoted there at the ICC only made things worse, especially when you see the arrest warrant against Putin. Thus, the ICC also employs judges from this talent factory, whose leaders have sworn to final victory over Russia and the USA. Not to mention all the federal judges who are now desperately trying to take action against Donald Trump. In any case, I sent the documents worldwide, and many emails didn’t arrive. Websites also didn’t work, or the email template didn’t work, etc. Court websites were unavailable, etc., worldwide; the measures were therefore directed not just against Russia, but against three-quarters of the world. VPN was also of little use here, as the IP changed but the proxy as the backbone constantly intervened.

Mossad as example

I have now been able to get around the problem in another way and the whole world, except for the Germans, is getting to grips with the Nazi network that has kept the entire party landscape in Germany, including the press, alive.

I even went to Ramstein Air Base to surrender the Nazi files and the RAF’s connection to this Nazi foundation, including the Nazi file on Pfizer. I don’t think the US believes that, given the relevance of Pfizer’s Nazi files, the German security agencies, the BKA and BND, failed to notice that the prosecutors investigating the attacks on US soldiers came from the same foundation as the terrorists.

However, that’s not the topic today, I wanted to maintain my Gettr account and started gettr and again a proxy that led to the company incapsula blocked me.

So I thought I’d take a look at Incapsula, a company owned by Imperva. Founded in 2002 as part of an American company, it was acquired by a company called Thoma Bravo. During the coronavirus pandemic, it provided the required services in the EU. It was sold at the end of 2023. They sold it to a company called : Thales.

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/thoma-bravo-completes-sale-of-imperva-to-thales-302003992.html

Imperva was led by a man named Chris Hylen until 2023.

Who is Thales?

Thales (officially Thales Group) is a French technology conglomerate specializing in aerospace, defense, security, and transportation. The company is known for its work in areas such as military communications, air traffic control systems, satellite technology, and cybersecurity.

Ownership Structure of Thales:

Thales is a publicly traded company listed on Euronext Paris (Symbol: HO). Its largest shareholders are:

1. The French State: Holds approximately 26% of the shares and is the largest single shareholder.
2. Dassault Aviation: A French aerospace company that holds about 25% of the shares.
3. Free Float: The remaining shares are owned by institutional and private investors.

Who is Euronext?

Euronext Paris is part of Euronext NV, a pan-European exchange group that operates several stock exchanges in Europe, including Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, Lisbon, Dublin, Oslo, and Milan. Euronext itself is an independent, publicly listed company traded on its own exchange (symbol: ENX).
Ownership structure:

Euronext is owned by a variety of shareholders, including institutional investors, investment funds, and private investors. There is no single majority owner, as its shares are publicly traded. However, some of the largest shareholders are often large investment companies such as BlackRock, Vanguard, or Norges Bank Investment Management (the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund).
Background:

Euronext was formed in 2000 through the merger of the Amsterdam, Brussels, and Paris stock exchanges. Other exchanges were later added. The group is one of the largest exchange platforms in Europe, offering trading, clearing, and other financial services.

I think it’s important to know who controls the flow of information. This goes far beyond the control of Russian state media. US courts, South American police authorities, etc. Everything here is filtered through a proxy, and VPNs only work for show.

Of course, all of this also casts a bad light on supposed enlighteners like Musk or politicians like Orban. Surely they would be the first to notice this? Right?

---

Currently, stories about Pam Bondi, the Epstein Files, and the cover-up by the FBI in New York are once again making the rounds in the media. I then received a video showing the „ousted“ FBI New York chief, James Denehy, leaving his office. The entire scene was beyond bizarre—accompanied by bagpipe music and surrounded by a group of undeniably odd individuals whom I wouldn’t even trust with my dogs, this so-called „chief“ made his exit from the FBI. The spectacle was nothing short of a psychedelic paradox.

These are the people entrusted with overseeing the well-being of the public. Given that I have grown accustomed to seeing disturbed individuals in positions of power in Germany, I immediately looked into Denehy’s qualifications. According to his own statements, he studied civil engineering. This led me to question how someone with such an unrelated background ended up as the head of the FBI in New York. My search quickly led me to Christopher Wray, the former FBI Director.

At that moment, I was reminded of the case of Tara Reade. And that is precisely what this brief reflection is about—to highlight just how broken the FBI truly is and the enormous task ahead for Kash Patel. The Tara Reade case should not only serve as an exposé but also as a guide and opportunity to eliminate similar vulnerabilities and pave the way for a better America.

---

I met Tara in Russia. In October 2023, I was invited by FondFBR to give a presentation in Moscow about the revelations concerning Theodor Pfizer and the Studienstiftung. Around ten people were present, each sharing their own experiences and discoveries. Tara spoke about the events that led her to leave the U.S. for Russia and how the Biden administration—particularly the FBI under Wray—had played a role in it.

Since we had already concluded our work with Polaris at the time, and I was therefore interested in the topic of the FBI, I decided to look into Tara’s case online. I came across an article from CNN. However, when I tried to open the website, it loaded for a second and then immediately closed. It was completely inaccessible from Germany. I repeated the attempt several times until I finally used a tracer. The result showed that the website was being intercepted in the town of Haar, Bavaria.

Through a contact with intelligence expertise, I learned that the server in question was under the control of the BND (Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service). Naturally, I took multiple screenshots of the findings and distributed them worldwide to ensure that there was clear evidence of exactly which server was responsible.

On social media, the usual suspects were set against her. The standard mechanisms of character assassination were put into motion, even though the mainstream media initially reported on her case with some neutrality. However, the FBI also did its part in portraying Reade as a Russian disinformation agent—at the forefront of this effort was Wray.

In 2017, Wray replaced the ousted Comey after being appointed by Trump. However, this decision would prove to be anything but fortunate. Both Comey and Wray played key roles in shaping an anti-Russian narrative. Comey took office in 2013, coinciding with the exposure of Azov Films—a child pornography ring that originally operated in Germany before shifting its production to Ukraine in 2000. The films were distributed worldwide through Canada.

In 2008, Toronto police alerted federal law enforcement agencies across the globe, providing them with customer lists. As a result, 400 children were rescued—children who had been openly advertised on Facebook. The primary perpetrators were Canadian families with Ukrainian roots and connections. The films were sold internationally from Canada, reaching approximately 110 countries. Yet, despite the scale of the operation, only around 700 arrests were made worldwide.

Germany was the only country explicitly named on Wikipedia for failing to take action, with the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) being accused of repeated failures in handling the Azov Films case. Following this scandal—centered around the exploitation of 400 children—the head of the BKA was appointed to lead „Weisser Ring,“ a victim support organization. Meanwhile, the vice president of Interpol, elected under Comey and reaffirmed five years later by Wray, played a key role in the cover-up.

Beyond the BKA’s incompetence in dealing with Azov Films, there are at least two highly significant factors that add to the controversy. First, Germany was the only country to deliberately misreport the filming locations. The film list is publicly accessible, and this claim is easily verifiable. Second, a notorious pedophile ring regularly organized trips to Crimea to „honor“ actors who had supposedly died in suspicious car accidents.

Despite the indisputable nature of these facts, German law enforcement, politicians, the press, and even victim advocacy groups falsely labeled these Ukrainian films as Romanian. The fact that Romania tolerated this misrepresentation might say something about its current political climate. In any case, both Comey and Wray helped cover up horrific crimes against children and installed individuals who perpetuated the false narrative that Romania was to blame.

This, of course, raises serious doubts about the credibility of claims that Tara Reade is some kind of Russian asset. If such clear and overwhelming evidence can be ignored in order to protect Ukraine, what else is being overlooked?

The second critical aspect of Wray’s role is that the head of Interpol comes from a foundation led by someone who once swore to achieve the „final victory“ over the United States. Ensuring national security and countering all threats is precisely the responsibility of an FBI director. Given this, it is deeply questionable why someone from the same foundation that produced RAF terrorists—who murdered countless U.S. soldiers—was allowed to become the head of Interpol.

Of course, no one is claiming that Wray alone was responsible for embedding this foundation into American society. However, it was his duty to monitor such influences, especially given the impact of movements like Fridays for Future, BLM, and other social upheavals that have significantly altered American society—not to mention the murder of U.S. soldiers. A competent FBI director would have reported this matter to the FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) authorities, especially since the Pfizer files are publicly accessible. He also should have scrutinized key positions within the government, such as the FDA when the COVID-19 crisis began.

I can think of a thousand things Wray should have done in light of this foundation’s influence. However, labeling Tara Reade as a „Russian asset“ was certainly not one of them—if anything, he himself acted more like a German or Ukrainian asset.

Since the topic of children has been mentioned, it is crucial to highlight that politics has been demonstrably conducted at the expense of children’s well-being, with the aim of radicalizing and polarizing society. While unverifiable claims about Russia are freely reported and judged, verifiable facts about Ukraine are conveniently shifted onto Romania. This is not the behavior of a mere pedophile, but rather of someone who consciously weaponizes pedophilia for political purposes.

In my view, this is even worse than pedophilic crimes driven by compulsions—because in this case, it is not about uncontrolled urges but about a calculated political agenda.

Wishing Tara all the best in her lawsuit against the FBI.

Some time has passed since I visited AirBasen regarding the RAF murders and distributed information about Pfizer’s Nazi past and its connections to the Islamist scene. Now the question arises: What happens next, and what perspective do we have?
It’s certain that all intelligence agencies were asleep at the wheel, and the sole blame cannot be placed on the Germans. The so-called “re-education” never took place, as research clearly shows. However, the big difference is that, compared to 1933, the Germans have now infected the entire world. As early as 1947, this could have been seen in the CDU’s election poster, which openly demanded a return to the Oder-Neisse Line. The party clearly had no intention of relinquishing the lost territories—like a petulant child. It’s thanks to the chancellor of this very party that the Americans allowed Theodor Pfizer’s résumé to be “polished,” enabling him to take over the foundation again. From this foundation emerged not only the RAF terrorists, who got along famously with Islamist attackers, but also the so-called “jurists” who crafted the legal theory of the continued existence of the Third Reich. Ursula von der Leyen’s father openly philosophized about this, explicitly referencing the “1937 Constitution.” However, Germany had no constitution in 1937—only the constitutional laws that Hitler amusingly referred to as “bulls,” thus proving the clerical undertone here as well. Point this out, and you’ll immediately have American and German Reichsbürger (sovereign citizens) on your back.

We already know that you owe Pfizer’s “graduates”—one of whom openly swore to achieve final victory over the Allies—to fringe issues like transgender rights, USAID, propaganda, Fridays for Future (FFF), Black Lives Matter (BLM), Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), and so on. But how should we evaluate this overall? In the end, the world will have to come to terms with the fact that Germany has been fooling it for 80 years. I’ll now provide some examples—though not all, as much of it becomes apparent on its own.

With the end of World War II, lawsuits for damages and criminal proceedings began. These proceedings were accompanied by well-meaning nonprofit organizations that collected donations for decades. Foremost among them is the “Claims Conference,” which for decades supposedly helped victims seek compensation—without noticing that the judges came from the same foundation established by IG Farben, first to cause the damage and then managed under Theodor Pfizer’s leadership. The victims faced lengthy, costly proceedings, while the so-called helpers stood by sympathetically, prattling on about justice. Who ultimately financed these proceedings? Exactly—the perpetrator network. I’m deliberately naming the Claims Conference here because, since 1951, it has been involved in these proceedings and its members surely noticed Theodor Pfizer’s non-“denazification.” How they simultaneously gaslighted the victims remains a mystery to me.

This foundation, which was ultimately the source of the evil, even extended its reach to Israel. Supported by Hannah Arendt, the highly celebrated philosopher, it used religion as a shield and embedded itself in all critical areas there. Meanwhile, the same Arendt philosophized with Schmidt about the right to revolution—while the RAF emerged from the foundation he “re-established.” It’s also worth noting that Schmidt is the source of the quote that the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) is merely a “fragment,” a line often cited by the Reichsbürger movement. Although Pfizer, through his role in the management of “Operations East,” must have regularly been in contact with Eichmann, his “alumni” were welcomed with open arms and allowed to shape Israeli daily politics. How fitting that other alumni were already on good terms with the PLO. It’s almost comical that no intelligence agency noticed this.

Next, of course, is the fact that these alumni have entrenched themselves in global daily affairs. Setting aside Corona and their role at the FDA for a moment, judgments and decisions were made by ideologically driven individuals. What kind of image does this project onto the German legal system internationally? Insurance companies that claim not to have noticed this for 80 years? Countless court proceedings tainted by ideology, with insurers failing in their duty to investigate? These insurers have dedicated review committees to analyze cases and warn clients. The same applies to reinsurers—did the obvious really escape them?

Of course, one could take this further and argue that local court decisions on inheritance or guardianship matters could be blanketly called into question. I’m certain this undermines the legitimacy of the entire country. We now have all the information out in the open. The algorithm we’ve published can easily be used to track it down.